logo

TOP REASONS FOR CONCERN

QUID PRO QUO WITH NOW
GOVERNOR STEVE SISOLAK

‘Nevada County Commissioner Accused of Destroying Evidence Amid Allegations of ‘Quid Pro Quo’ Scheme With Democrat Gov. Sisolak’

On October 20, 2018 via email evidence Jones appeared to bribe Steve Sisolak who was running for governor. The offer Jones made was simple. Sisolak would announce he was against the Clark County Commission hearing matters related to Gypsum Resources in December 2018 and Jones would deliver Sisolak support from environmental groups that he desperately needed to win. Jones also promised that his clients, Save Red Rock, would dismiss their ongoing litigation against Clark County. If Sisolak declined, Jones stated the litigation would be “uncomfortable” for Sisolak.

Case Document #19-01105-mkn Doc 133-8

DESTROYED
EVIDENCE

County Commissioner Accused Of Deleting Texts Prior To Red Rock Canyon Housing Vote’

Drew Johnson stated: “I’ve spent 20 years as a government watchdog and an open records expert. If there’s one thing I’ve learned in my career, it’s that elected officials don’t delete text messages unless they have something to hide. Justin Jones obviously has a lot to hide.”

FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS
FORENSIC EXAMINATION
OF PHONE

‘Never Before in the History of Clark County Has a Sitting County Commissioner Been Ordered by a Judge To Have Their Phone Forensically Examined’

“Developer’s lawyers said they had received text messages from others with whom Jones interacted that showed he received and sent texts prior to the vote. In one late October 2018 text exchange between Jones and Andy Maggi, at the time the head of the Nevada Conservation League, Jones remarked: “If Sisolak doesn’t want to play, then it’s going to blow up in his face tomorrow,” according to the Feb. 7th court filing.” Stated, Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Case Document #2:19-cv-00850-GMN-EJY Document 55

EDITORIAL: New commissioner should recuse himself on Blue Diamond Hill development

In Spite of Advance Warnings, Justin Jones Proceeded To Take The Less Ethical Approach and Voted On Gypsum Resources’ Application instead of Recusing Himself

“As for Mr. Jones, he’ll officially take his seat on the commission in January and says he no longer represents the green nonprofit. But if members of Save Red Rock think having their former counsel on the seven-member board will be enough to kill the Blue Diamond Hill plan, they may be disappointed. Mr. Jones is hopelessly conflicted here and should recuse himself from any debate or vote on the issue. If he takes the less ethical course, Gypsum Resources has a very good chance of once again prevailing in court.”

DECEIVED THE COURT
UNDER OATH

Jones Admits Under Oath He Willingly Deceived The Court For His Colleague

Q: “…you knew standing at Her Honor’s desk that all of the Jacobs emails sitting on Las Vegas Boulevard had not been produced to the plaintiffs, didn’t you?”
A: (JONES) “Yes.”
Q: “And you didn’t say a word to Her Honor in response to Patty Glaser’s plea that the evidentiary hearing go forward without the disclosure or even the identification of a hundred
thousand-plus emails sitting at Las Vegas Sands here in Las Vegas. You didn’t say a word.”
A: (JONES) “I didn’t, Mr. Pisanelli…”

DECEIVED THE COURT
UNDER OATH

Jones Admits Under Oath He Willingly Deceived The Court For His Colleague

Q: “…you knew standing at Her Honor’s desk that all of the Jacobs emails sitting on Las Vegas Boulevard had not been produced to the plaintiffs, didn’t you?”
A: (JONES) “Yes.”
Q: “And you didn’t say a word to Her Honor in response to Patty Glaser’s plea that the evidentiary hearing go forward without the disclosure or even the identification of a hundred
thousand-plus emails sitting at Las Vegas Sands here in Las Vegas. You didn’t say a word.”
A: (JONES) “I didn’t, Mr. Pisanelli…”

Thank you for reading. If you agree this corruption must be stopped, please consider completing this form if you’d like to know more and receive updates the moment they occur.